Medusa

Should Identity Theft Be Penalized More Harshly?

<p style&equals;"text-align&colon; justify&semi;">Identity theft&comma; which is the act of taking information associated with the identity of one person &lpar;social security number and date of birth&comma; for example&rpar; and using it for personal gain&comma; is a serious problem that can affect anyone&period; When a person fraudulent uses another person&&num;8217&semi;s information to obtain credit&comma; make purchases or gain unlawful access to that person&&num;8217&semi;s bank and other financial accounts&comma; this fraud affects not only the person whose information was compromised but also society as a whole&period; So serious is the problem of identity theft and identity fraud that both the Federal Trade Commission &lpar;FTC&rpar; and U&period;S&period; Department of Justice &lpar;DOJ&rpar; have websites committed to educating the public about the risk&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p style&equals;"text-align&colon; justify&semi;">According to the FTC&comma; identity theft cost Americans more than &dollar;1&period;5 billion in 2011&period; The number of consumer complaints related to identity theft&comma; as reported to the Consumer Sentinel Network&comma; increased almost 30 percent from 2010 to 2011&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p style&equals;"text-align&colon; center&semi;"><img class&equals;"size-full wp-image-6921 aligncenter" title&equals;"Should Identity Theft Be Penalized More Harshly&quest;" alt&equals;"Should Identity Theft Be Penalized More Harshly&quest;" src&equals;"https&colon;&sol;&sol;medusamagazine&period;com&sol;wp-content&sol;uploads&sol;2013&sol;09&sol;IdentityTheftPic&period;jpg" width&equals;"425" height&equals;"282" &sol;><&sol;p>&NewLine;<h2 style&equals;"text-align&colon; justify&semi;"><strong>Federal and State Laws on Identity Theft<&sol;strong><&sol;h2>&NewLine;<p style&equals;"text-align&colon; justify&semi;">Prior to 1998&comma; laws related to identity theft were classified as &&num;8220&semi;false personation&comma;&&num;8221&semi; a crime with its origin in the 19th century and defined as &&num;8220&semi;falsely assuming the identity of another to gain a benefit or avoid an expense&period;&&num;8221&semi; Congress made identity theft a federal offense through the passage of the Identity Theft and Assumption Deterrence Act of 1998&period; The purpose of the act was to strengthen existing laws with regard to identity theft by expanding the definition to read&colon;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p style&equals;"text-align&colon; justify&semi;">…&lbrack;to&rsqb; knowingly transfer or use&comma; without lawful authority&comma; a means of identification of another person with the intent to commit&comma; or to aid or abet&comma; any unlawful activity that constitutes a violation of Federal law&comma; or that constitutes a felony under any applicable State or local law&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p style&equals;"text-align&colon; justify&semi;">The law moved the emphasis from fraud against institutions to fraud against individuals&period; It also established the FTC as the clearinghouse for consumer identity theft crimes and increased penalties to a maximum of 15 years imprisonment&period; State laws &lpar;including the District of Columbia&comma; Guam&comma; Virgin Islands and Puerto Rico&rpar; mirror federal statutes regarding identity theft&comma; including provisions for credit repair and restoration of one&&num;8217&semi;s reputation as a result of identity theft or fraud&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<h2 style&equals;"text-align&colon; justify&semi;"><strong>Should Laws on Identity Theft Be Tougher&quest;<&sol;strong><&sol;h2>&NewLine;<p style&equals;"text-align&colon; justify&semi;">Increased access to technology makes the crime of identity theft that more pervasive and costly to consumers and the public&period; For example&comma; the Internal Revenue Service’s website reports 89 cases of tax fraud involving identity theft for 2013 that resulted in monetary penalties ranging from &dollar;15&comma;795 to &dollar;9&period;2 million and prison sentences ranging from 12 months to 317 months&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p style&equals;"text-align&colon; justify&semi;">As the number of cases and cost to victims continues to grow&comma; the temptation to increase penalties should be balanced with consumer education programs designed to help individuals better protect their identity&period; As criminals are caught and prosecuted by states and federal laws&comma; for up to 26 years in one instance&comma; individuals can learn what preventive steps they can take that are simple&comma; proven and effective in stopping identity theft and fraud from occurring in the first place&period; In other words&comma; punishing offenders is not nearly as effective as educating consumers when it comes to deterring this damaging and illegal behavior&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p style&equals;"text-align&colon; justify&semi;"><strong>Byline<&sol;strong><&sol;p>&NewLine;<p style&equals;"text-align&colon; justify&semi;">Donnie Preston is a freelance writer based in Orlando&comma; Florida&period; Identity theft is a serious societal problem&semi; those concerned about this issue should consider Protect Your Bubble Identity Theft Protection services&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p style&equals;"text-align&colon; justify&semi;">Image credit goes to ScanSnap&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;

Exit mobile version